Were writing this piece backwards- with the diner scene being completed first and the planning to follow for best control of how and why our characters should interact with each other.
Take this extract, for example. This is where we first introduce a conflict between Ember and Ben. Ember thinks the plan is unrealistic and Ben can't find a reason she's even there. There are a few details within this scene that took extra thought to emphasize the most realistic aspects of our piece:
- Ember has the stage direction "Not afraid". Most characters at this planned meet-up see Ben as above them and as leader, she doesn't. She's not even in the group, how would she know who is "alpha"?
- Ben's instant defense builds his character as stubborn and weak. His "I'm sorry?" shows he's going in with motive first and brains second. He doesn't know it yet, but Ember is the only reason the plan has a possibility to be successful.
- The stage direction "He pauses and looks around the table" is also an indicator of Ben's weakness. He makes a bold move and instantly searches for approval. Do other's give into this?
As we continue to develop the script, we understand the value of the detail- even within stage direction. Character intention is specifically important in a scene like this: introducing everyone's relationship with each other, their role in the heist, and how they feel about the heist. It's a lot to keep track of, so every line has to be full of intention- even if it feels like its "filler".
No comments:
Post a Comment